Article

TikTok Competitor Analysis: How to Build a Set and Measure It Honestly

15 min read
TikTok Competitor Analysis: How to Build a Set and Measure It Honestly

Direct answer: TikTok competitor analysis is not a hunt for a number to measure yourself against, because TikTok publishes no average engagement rate, no completion benchmark and no expected For You reach percentage. The only method that survives scrutiny is this: pick 5 to 8 accounts that actually target your audience, apply one identical formula to every one of them and to your own account, then read the differences inside that set. The comparison is internal. It is never against a figure from the internet.

And the biggest mistake happens before any measurement: studying the largest account. A creator with a million followers is not your competitor. Whoever targets your audience is. TikTok itself states in its recommendation system post that follower count is not a direct ranking factor, and that a video is not guaranteed distribution because earlier ones performed well. Follower count is the weakest number you could build a comparison on.

This page gives you the full sequence: how to build the set, what to measure and how, what you structurally cannot see, and how to turn what you find into a list of next videos.

Before comparing yourself to anyone, you need to be able to read your own numbers. That is covered in TikTok analytics.

Who to analyse: building the set in three tiers

Tier 1: Direct competitors

Same niche, same audience, same content type. Search inside TikTok for your niche's core terms and note who appears repeatedly in the first twenty results. Repetition is the signal, not a single appearance.

Tier 2: Indirect competitors

An adjacent niche taking a share of the same attention. If you make healthy-eating content, fitness creators are indirect competitors: same audience, same viewing time, different subject.

Tier 3: International outperformers in your niche

Creators in the same niche in other languages or markets. This tier is not a fair performance comparison, because the market differs. It gives you something more useful: formats and angles that have not reached your market yet.

Competitor typeWhat you learnUseful size
Direct, same marketWhat your audience actually wantsClose to yours or moderately larger
IndirectUnserved gaps in your audienceAny size
International in your nicheFormats not yet localisedThe strongest performers in the niche

A working rule, not a finding: 5 to 8 accounts. Fewer makes any difference you see plausibly coincidental; more than ten turns into admin you will not maintain. The number is a practical choice about workload, not a discovery.

If the analysis tells you the niche itself is wrong for you, that decision comes before measurement and belongs in TikTok personal branding.

Language and market split a niche into separate sets

Most competitor-analysis advice quietly assumes one language and one market. That assumption breaks the arithmetic.

  • Search in the words your audience actually types. Search results inside TikTok for a term and for its translation return substantially different creators, because they are different audiences with different reference points.
  • Treat each market as its own set. Creators serving different countries in the same language face different prices, products, cultural references and posting rhythms. Averaging them produces a number that describes nobody. Pick your set, then measure it.
  • Use Creative Center's country filter (next section) to see the landscape in the specific market you are targeting rather than the global one.

What to measure, and the rule that makes it comparable

MetricHow to compute itWhat it tells you
Average views per videoTotal views of the last 20 videos ÷ 20Actual reach capacity, not audience size
Engagement rate(likes + comments + shares) ÷ views × 100The share of reached viewers who acted
Comments-to-likes ratioComments ÷ likesWhether the content provokes a reply or just a quick tap
Posting cadenceVideos in the last 30 daysThe production volume you are comparing against
Top 5 videos by viewsWhat they have in commonThe format that works with this audience

The one rule that makes any of this mean something: use the same formula, the same denominator and the same number of videos for every account in the set, and put your own account in the same table. An engagement rate computed over views for one account and over followers for another produces two numbers that cannot be compared at all. Twenty videos for one account against five for another produces a difference caused by sample size, not performance.

Watch for the outlier effect too. One unusually large video lifts the average and hides typical performance. Compute the average once, then compute it again with the highest and lowest videos removed, and compare the two. The gap tells you whether you are looking at a consistent account or one living off a single hit.

Why there is no "average TikTok engagement rate"

This section replaces the benchmark table that used to sit on this page, because that table could not be sourced.

What TikTok publishes: nothing of the kind. No average engagement rate, no "good" completion percentage, no expected For You reach share appears in the Help Center, in Creator Academy, or on the transparency pages. Circulated figures like "a normal engagement rate is around 4%" come from third-party analytics companies, computed with different formulas on different samples in different years, then repeated without attribution until they read like official numbers.

What TikTok recommends instead is relative measurement against your own account. In Building a repeatable video format, TikTok writes: "Look at your analytics and compare retention on your next post to the last three you put up, that's your read on whether the format is working for your audience."

Applied to competitor analysis: your reference is your own set. Compute the metric identically for every account, then read the ranking and the spread within the set: who is highest, who is lowest, where you sit. That is a conclusion you can defend. "My engagement is 3.2% and the global average is 4%, so I am behind" is a conclusion built on a number with no source.

What a competitor's public page cannot tell you

Before you build a decision on an analysis, know its limits. A public profile shows views, likes, comments and shares. That is all.

What it does not show, and what appears only to the account owner in TikTok Studio analytics:

  • Retention and average watch time, the two metrics closest to actual video quality.
  • Traffic sources: how much came from the For You feed, from search, and from followers. Two accounts with identical view counts can be reaching new audiences or recycling their own followers.
  • Audience data: territories, active times, who actually follows them.
  • Saves, which are not exposed on most public surfaces.

So any claim of the form "my competitor's retention is 62%" is an estimate, whatever tool produced it. This is another argument for comparing inside the set: everyone in it is measured with the same incomplete numbers, so the differences between you stay meaningful even when the absolute figures are not.

TikTok's free tools: Creative Center

Before paying for anything, two official free surfaces cover most of the work.

What TikTok documents: TikTok Creative Center is TikTok's own surface publishing trending hashtags, sounds, creators and videos, filterable by country and time window. It is free and does not require an ad account for the public trend views.

How to use it specifically for competitor work:

  • The country filter is the most valuable control: set it to your target market to see the local landscape instead of the global one.
  • The trending creators list for that market and window surfaces accounts for your set that manual search never reaches.
  • Top-performing videos show the formats working now in that market, not a year ago.
  • Hashtags and sounds show what is starting to climb before it saturates.

A clear limit: Creative Center is an advertising surface and its trend data is descriptive of what happened, not a promise of what will. A sound or hashtag appearing there does not mean using it raises your reach.

TikTok's free tools: Creator Search Insights and content gaps

What TikTok documents in its announcement of the tool:

  • It gives creators insight into the topics people are searching for on TikTok.
  • You reach it by typing "Creator Search Insights" in the app's search bar.
  • Topics can be sorted by category (tourism, sports, science) or by For You, meaning topics related to the kind of content you create.
  • You can filter for content gap topics, described verbatim as: "These topics are searched for often, but aren't featured in a large number of videos on TikTok." High demand, low supply.
  • Topic popularity appears as a popularity score or a "Recommended Topic" label.

The caveat that has to be stated: TikTok describes the tool as available in "select regions". Do not assume it is in your build; check in the app. If it is not there, the practical substitute is manual search inside TikTok for your audience's phrasings, reading both the quality and the quantity of what comes back.

The full walkthrough of the tool lives in the Creator Search Insights guide. Here it does one job: comparing what the audience searches for against what your competitors actually publish.

The comment section is your most honest data source

Comments are the only place where a competitor's audience tells you what it did not get. Look for four patterns:

  • A repeated question the video did not answer. If it recurs across videos, it is a ready video idea with demand already proven.
  • A constraint the content ignored. "My space is small", "my budget is limited", "I do not have those tools". Content that addresses the constraint reaches an audience the competitor left behind.
  • A recurring objection. An objection is a ready angle: address it directly and you win the people the original did not convince.
  • Comparisons to other accounts. The audience draws your competitive map for you.

Log what you find in one place. The pattern never appears in a single video; it appears in the accumulation.

Reading a competitor's top videos

Open the five strongest videos on each account and look for what they share, not for the view count.

  • The opening seconds. How does it start: a question, a claim, the result before the explanation? The same pattern recurring across all five matters more than any one of them succeeding. Writing those openings is covered in TikTok hooks.
  • Length and structure. If the strongest videos cluster in one length range, that tells you what this audience tolerates from this kind of content. That is an observation about audience preference, not about the algorithm: no official TikTok source links video length to any ranking advantage.
  • Comments-to-likes ratio. A high ratio means the video started a conversation; a low one means it earned quick approval. Practical interpretation: the ratio tells you the type of response, and nothing about distribution. Do not convert it into a claim about what TikTok prefers.
  • Words in the captions. Terms repeated across the highest-viewed captions are usually the terms the audience is searching with.
  • The absent topics. What does the account not cover despite its own audience asking? That is the gap.

Turning gaps into a content list

Step 1: Map the competitor's topic territory

Classify each account's last 30 videos in a table: topic, type (educational, entertainment, opinion), length, views. Half an hour per account is enough, and clear clusters emerge: subjects repeated, and subjects never touched.

Step 2: Cross-reference against audience search

Compare what they publish against what the audience searches for, using Creator Search Insights where it is available or manual search where it is not. The difference between the two is your content list.

Step 3: Prioritise the gaps

Gap typePriorityWhy
High search demand, almost no contentHighestAn opening that may not last
High search demand, weak existing contentHighYou win on quality rather than scarcity
Repeated unanswered questions in competitor commentsHighDemand is proven and the audience is primed
Topic popular in other markets, not localised yetMediumA time advantage that may be short
Topic the competitor tried and underperformedMediumThe audience may simply not want it

Turning that list into a repeatable publishing system is a separate job, covered in TikTok content strategy. For idea and sound sources beyond your competitor set, see TikTok content ideas.

Three ways to outperform, and the line at copying

A different angle on the same topic

The competitor explains "how to grow your followers". You explain why follower count is not the number worth chasing. Same audience, same keyword, an angle that catches everyone the first framing did not convince.

Depth against breadth

The competitor covers ten tools in one video. You give one tool a full video with real depth. The audience searching seriously picks depth.

Application against theory

The competitor explains the concept; you show the execution: real steps and a real outcome, without inflated numbers or promises. "I did this and this happened" beats "do this and this will happen", provided it is true.

Copying verbatim is the line. The reason is not the usual claim about a "negative signal". It is what TikTok actually publishes: the For You feed standards list low-quality or unoriginal content, including content that is primarily a re-post, among the categories that can be made ineligible for the For You feed. That is a rule about re-posting and unoriginal content, not about two creators phrasing a hook similarly.

Practically, a copy loses twice: anyone who saw the original will not finish it, and anyone who did not gets the weaker version. Borrow the psychological pattern of the opening (curiosity, promise, identity) with your own subject and wording. How recommendation actually works is explained in the TikTok algorithm.

The tracking sheet and the routine

Competitor analysis is not a one-off task; it is a sheet you update. Create one with these columns:

ColumnWhat goes in it
AccountUsername
TierDirect, indirect, international
Date measuredThe day you recorded the numbers
Average views (last 20)The figure
Average views excluding highest and lowestThe figure
Engagement rateSame formula on every row
Comments-to-likes ratioThe figure
Videos in the last 30 daysThe figure
Recurring topicsThree words
Gap noticedOne line

Include a row for your own account. Without it the sheet is information; with it, it is a decision.

Weekly, 15 minutes: open each account's best video of the week, log any new topic that appeared, and read the comments on the top performer.

Monthly, one hour: update every row with the same formula, review the gaps, and compare your month-over-month movement against the set's. The monthly change inside the sheet is the indicator, not the absolute number in any row.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need paid tools for TikTok competitor analysis?

No. Creative Center, Creator Search Insights, the comment sections and one spreadsheet cover the entire workflow described here. Paid tools save time when you track many accounts, but they cannot reach data you cannot see either: retention and traffic sources for someone else's account are not exposed to any external tool, and any figure shown for them is an estimate.

How often should I analyse competitors?

A monthly review of about an hour, plus a light weekly check of around fifteen minutes. Consistency matters more than frequency: use the same formula and the same video count every time, or the change you observe will be caused by your measurement rather than by their performance.

What is the difference between competitor analysis and content theft?

Competitor analysis studies patterns and gaps in order to build something of your own. Theft is re-uploading someone's video, copying their script, or using their footage. The first is legitimate work; the second violates rights and platform policy, and TikTok lists re-posted content among what can be made ineligible for the For You feed.

How do I know whether a competitor is actually outperforming me?

Do not compare follower counts. Compare average views per video and engagement rate computed with the same formula. An account with 50,000 followers averaging 5,000 views reaches fewer people than one with 10,000 followers averaging 20,000. TikTok itself states that follower count is not a direct ranking factor.

Is there a good engagement rate I should aim for?

There is no official figure. TikTok publishes no average and no target for any of these metrics. Circulated numbers come from third-party reports using different formulas and samples. Your reference is your own account's average over the last ten to twenty posts, plus your position inside the competitor set you measured the same way.

Where do I start if I have no competitor list at all?

Search TikTok for three phrases your audience genuinely uses, and note every account that keeps reappearing. Then open Creative Center, set the country filter to your market, and read the trending creators list. Twenty minutes is enough for a first list of eight names, which you refine later.

Practical Summary

  • Bottom line: there is no official TikTok engagement average. The only defensible comparison is inside a competitor set you chose and measured with one formula.
  • Build a list of 5 to 8 accounts across three tiers: direct in-market, indirect, and international in your niche.
  • Search in the exact words your audience uses, and treat each language and market as its own comparable set.
  • Apply the same formula and the same video count to every account, put your own row in the table, and recompute the average with the highest and lowest removed.
  • Know the limits: retention, traffic sources and audience data are visible only to the account owner.
  • Creative Center with the country filter and Creator Search Insights with the content-gap filter are the two free tools, with the caveat that the second is available in select regions only.
  • Comments are the most honest source: a repeated unanswered question is a video with demand already proven.
  • Your next step: open one sheet, write eight account names plus your own, and fill in the average-views column only. One column filled honestly beats a full table built on borrowed numbers.

The rest of the TikTok guides are collected in the TikTok Resource Hub, and the wider growth system in how to grow on TikTok.

Official Sources

Share this article: